tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post1136462275048152693..comments2024-03-14T09:50:44.315+00:00Comments on Psychological comments: Was the Scientific Dishonesty Minister trying to suppress population estimates?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09320614837348759094noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-29591225417937485292013-11-21T09:55:46.502+00:002013-11-21T09:55:46.502+00:00Thanks. I have posted a reply there. Thanks. I have posted a reply there. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09320614837348759094noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-60595296814493566452013-11-21T00:58:57.674+00:002013-11-21T00:58:57.674+00:00Retraction Watch has a post on the Nyborg controve...Retraction Watch has a <a href="http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/11/13/citing-scientific-dishonesty-danish-board-calls-for-retraction-of-controversial-paper-on-decline-of-western-civilization/" rel="nofollow">post on the Nyborg controversy</a>. In the comments section <i>Jelte Wicherts</i>, an established IQ researcher with environmentalist leanings on the group differences issue expressed doubt that Nyborg's behavior constitutes scientific misconduct. Also of note is a comment by <i>Marco</i> who disputes the accuracy of your account of some of the details of the DCSD committee.<br /><br />B.B.B.B.https://www.blogger.com/profile/00579154174541195967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-19643797885987406012013-11-21T00:30:11.720+00:002013-11-21T00:30:11.720+00:00Apparently people are now calling for harsher puni...Apparently people are now <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kristeligt-dagblad.dk%2Fartikel%2F534301%3ADanmark--Forskere-kraever-haardere-domme-for-fusk%23" rel="nofollow">calling for harsher punishment</a> against those ruled scientifically dishonest by the Danish government.<br /><br />B.B.B.B.https://www.blogger.com/profile/00579154174541195967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-32098068783172756172013-11-20T16:01:17.451+00:002013-11-20T16:01:17.451+00:00In fact, it is Prof Lynn in his letter who says 10...In fact, it is Prof Lynn in his letter who says 100, which is probably because he wrote it from memory. Both Nyborg and Lynn's data show a score of 98<br />Denmark 5-11 yr olds,n=628, SPM, IQ97, Vejleskov, 1968<br />Denmark Adults, n=122, CF, IQ99, Buj, 1981<br />Denmark: median 98 <br /><br />Thanks for being another eagle-eyed reader, which is what I want! <br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09320614837348759094noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-90144416226910168822013-11-20T05:26:25.195+00:002013-11-20T05:26:25.195+00:00....(as compared with 100 for indigenous Danes) is...<i>....(as compared with 100 for indigenous Danes) is based on solid evidence<br /></i><br />Prof Nyborg does not say that Dane IQ is 100. He says 98. <br /><br />You too are Dishonesty Committee material...! :-)<br /><br />But the post is very good. Jhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05676167615981895061noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-8056148779762315082013-11-17T13:16:06.293+00:002013-11-17T13:16:06.293+00:00"It is likely, on balance of probability, tha..."It is likely, on balance of probability, that genetics plays a part in all human differences": unless humans are different in this respect from all other animals, how could it be otherwise?deariemenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-17314423824442448712013-11-17T12:45:11.652+00:002013-11-17T12:45:11.652+00:00Papers should be subjected to any criticism which ...Papers should be subjected to any criticism which can be substantiated at any time! The three main factors to be considered for these sorts of predictions are 1) How many immigrants will enter the country 2) How many babies will they have compared to the locals 3) How quickly and to what extent will their contribution match or exceed that of the locals? The current picture appears to be 1) Many 2) More than the locals 3) Less than the locals. The last point seems true for two generations as shown by PISA data. The first two factors may change quickly, the last more slowly, but change there will (probably) be.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09320614837348759094noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-76112421540598304222013-11-17T10:55:07.521+00:002013-11-17T10:55:07.521+00:00Are valid criticisms of Nyborg's research just...Are valid criticisms of Nyborg's research just a question of timing, then?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com