tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post3365000682326723889..comments2024-03-14T09:50:44.315+00:00Comments on Psychological comments: Flynn effect as a retesting, rule-based gainAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09320614837348759094noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-92079706442359554492020-11-24T00:14:28.663+00:002020-11-24T00:14:28.663+00:00That is a good tip particularly to those new to th...That is a good tip particularly to those new to the blogosphere. Simple but very precise information… Thanks for sharing this one. A must read article!erectile dysfunction medicationshttps://besterectiledysfunctionpills.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-25690364466362898022013-11-10T03:09:46.963+00:002013-11-10T03:09:46.963+00:00Armstrong & Woodley :
Theoretically, I believ...Armstrong & Woodley :<br /><br />Theoretically, I believe this is likely. Gottfredson in "Why g Matters" says that in automated jobs, those requiring to repeat the same (working) process, g is less important. I think this is close to what your model is just saying.<br /><br />And yet there is something. Perhaps I'm incorrect, but given the rule-dependence theory, it seems that you think the more a test is rule-dependent (see here, for a <a href="http://www.iqmindware.com/iq-mindware/how-to-do-a-raven-matrices-test/" rel="nofollow">brief description</a> of a rule) the less g-loaded the test is. You cite Fox & Mitchum (<a href="http://www.iapsych.com/iqmr/fe/LinkedDocuments/fox2012.pdf" rel="nofollow">2012</a>). I read that paper few months ago, a pretty good one, but unless I misread it, the authors said that when you take people of 1940-cohort and people of 1990-cohort with equal total raw score on Raven, the old (1940) cohort is able to infer more rules than the recent cohort, not less. Given Carpenter et al. (<a href="http://kryten.mm.rpi.edu/COURSES/LOGAIS02/carpenter.pdf" rel="nofollow">1990</a>) article (cited in your paper) it seems that the tests having more rules are more complex. I interpret this as saying "more g-loaded". Something is out of place. I would have expected, given your model, older cohort to underperform recent cohort on the ability of inferring rules, not the opposite.MH19870410http://humanvarieties.org/2013/10/04/environmental-sweet-spot-can-explain-differential-regression-results/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-25116620443127631282013-11-08T01:06:46.482+00:002013-11-08T01:06:46.482+00:00To put it in layperson's terms, intelligence s...To put it in layperson's terms, intelligence simply means the ability to learn things, fact, theories, rules, etc. That ability is only manifested when it is directed, and in different social locales (I hate to use the phrase "cultural contexts") that ability will be directed to different things. Further, it seems logical that there is a finite amount of direction that is possible, so two different people with similar cognitive potential will have different manifestations of that ability if they have spent their lives having the direction of that ability formed in different social locations. This probably accounts for the Flynn Effect.<br /><br />As an aside, my aversion to using "cultural context" lies in the notion that "culture" is something akin to different flavors of ice cream, that cultural differences have no effect on measurable outcomes between the different groups of people who form different cultures. The reality is that different cultures direct the ability to learn in different directions so any differences in measure are going to have some variation depending on the environment in which one was raised.<br /><br />I'm guessing that even Raven's is going to have a cultural bias, in the sense that the sorts of rule-following and understanding are going to be more prevalent in some culture than in others.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09260398531366109345noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-33472523393781779902013-11-07T22:30:19.673+00:002013-11-07T22:30:19.673+00:00I'm not sure what you're talking about.I'm not sure what you're talking about.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-86141841853681171402013-11-07T22:02:52.285+00:002013-11-07T22:02:52.285+00:00Hi Elijah,
I have spent a great deal of time, as ...Hi Elijah,<br /><br />I have spent a great deal of time, as a layperson on the subject, attempting to understand variations in human cognitive function. I have long suspected that individuals variation in cognition can be effectively modelled for a population on a local, but not global basis.<br /><br />I think that a global model would most effectively analyze the average differences between those locales.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09260398531366109345noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-10427047025704545392013-11-05T23:38:56.236+00:002013-11-05T23:38:56.236+00:00That;s the uncorrected proof - a corrected proof w...That;s the uncorrected proof - a corrected proof will be available soon.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-5871421522115378672013-11-05T08:49:49.856+00:002013-11-05T08:49:49.856+00:00Here.
B.B.<a href="http://ge.tt/2tKL70x/v/0?c" rel="nofollow">Here</a>.<br /><br />B.B.B.B.https://www.blogger.com/profile/00579154174541195967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-66383343913303164632013-11-05T00:30:10.069+00:002013-11-05T00:30:10.069+00:00Oh my God. I've been congratulated by Steve Sa...Oh my God. I've been congratulated by Steve Sailer. My life is complete. Thankyouthankyouthankyou.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-20051765435263574042013-11-04T04:29:37.908+00:002013-11-04T04:29:37.908+00:00No. It's a somewhat facetious statement.No. It's a somewhat facetious statement.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-78392383915333058942013-11-04T01:25:24.043+00:002013-11-04T01:25:24.043+00:00"Of course, the precocious generally burn out..."Of course, the precocious generally burn out."<br /><br />Have you got any statistics on that?Luke Leahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11290760894780619646noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-24894511166170800722013-11-03T23:37:21.384+00:002013-11-03T23:37:21.384+00:00Thanks. Of course, the precocious generally burn o...Thanks. Of course, the precocious generally burn out.Elijah F. Armstronghttp://elijahlarmstrong.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-6870983437710423042013-11-03T20:53:11.568+00:002013-11-03T20:53:11.568+00:00That is impressive at your age. It makes me embarr...That is impressive at your age. It makes me embarrassed in comparison.TGGPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11017651009634767649noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-15429487793716667712013-11-03T01:47:13.192+00:002013-11-03T01:47:13.192+00:00Not yet. I hope to upload a pdf to my blog at some...Not yet. I hope to upload a pdf to my blog at some point.Elijah F. Armstrongnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-20938954770041141722013-11-03T00:13:28.102+00:002013-11-03T00:13:28.102+00:00Is there an un gated version of the paper?Is there an un gated version of the paper?Puzzle Piratenoreply@blogger.com