tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post410801858164418188..comments2024-03-14T09:50:44.315+00:00Comments on Psychological comments: Breast is best, but for IQ as well?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09320614837348759094noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-75424559436394591532013-08-11T07:03:19.599+01:002013-08-11T07:03:19.599+01:00Is it a Jensen FX?Is it a Jensen FX?Elijah Armstronghttp://elijahlarmstrong.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-88407191828646534302013-07-30T19:05:40.950+01:002013-07-30T19:05:40.950+01:00For the first paper (Belfort et al.), it's bee...For the first paper (Belfort et al.), it's been pointed out that only researchers who'd forgotten about genes would fail to control for paternal, as well as maternal, IQ. But fail they did.<br /><br />Since the confidence intervals for the breastfeeding effects are, as you note, so close to zero (at least for two of the three childhood IQ measures), it's not exactly a stretch to predict that they'd overlap zero if paternal IQ were added into the equation.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17996612842697816575noreply@blogger.com