tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post884741747097428919..comments2024-03-14T09:50:44.315+00:00Comments on Psychological comments: Is your face special?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09320614837348759094noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-18655075305048248812015-01-19T19:03:23.552+00:002015-01-19T19:03:23.552+00:00... But the most important here is, what is the mo...... But the most important here is, what is the motivation to new flying routes??? The answer is simplest, "collective conservation" or survive. Mitigate dangers. <br /><br />SantocultoAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-77328521014071852172015-01-19T18:08:57.305+00:002015-01-19T18:08:57.305+00:00Sorry, solve novel problems and NOT TO BE drug-add...Sorry, solve novel problems and NOT TO BE drug-addict.<br /><br />SantocultoAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-46429074394588028182015-01-19T18:05:55.729+00:002015-01-19T18:05:55.729+00:00I refute theory of Kanazawa because to solve novel...I refute theory of Kanazawa because to solve novel problems you need solve it and not to be alcoholic or drug-addict. Paradox intelligence or savannah hypothesis start that some incongruent ideas: <br /><br />Intelligence= iq only,<br />there are novel memes ( novel since what????),<br />Alcoholism or homossexuality is to new flying routes of birds bigger heads,<br />There is complete free will and or doesn't exist co-pathogenic evolution that regulate and predispose most our behavior. <br /><br />Kanazawa mistakes novel routes flying of smarter birds ( higher level of intelligence and creativity and higher perception of errors potentially dangerous linked with natural curiosity) with "novel" behavior. Smarter birds are more curious and higher risk than average birds. Novel behavior can be anything and very probable to be contextual.<br /><br />Not correlate with iq doesn't implies that is not intelligence because is evident that is. <br /><br />Novel positive behaviors= solve novel problems with new manipulation of perceptual memory and to be drug- user. Can correlate with it but is not true analogy. My opinion.<br /><br />SantocultoAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-59181433315381334082015-01-19T12:17:39.742+00:002015-01-19T12:17:39.742+00:00Thanks. Its possible that there are some "mod...Thanks. Its possible that there are some "modules" but I doubt there can be many of them, or the positive manifold would not be encountered so often when a broad range of tests are used on a broad range of people.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09320614837348759094noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-409777524033301412015-01-19T12:13:23.995+00:002015-01-19T12:13:23.995+00:00Yes, probably. However, I think general was used t...Yes, probably. However, I think general was used to explain that it was representative of the general population, not a specific clinical sample.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09320614837348759094noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-85353932911620137812015-01-19T01:06:15.268+00:002015-01-19T01:06:15.268+00:00Satoshi Kanazawa in the "Intelligence Paradox...Satoshi Kanazawa in the "Intelligence Paradox" claims that several aspects of social ability are largely uncorrelated with intelligence due to general intelligence's primary use being solving evolutionarily novel problems, although I think other researchers have refuted some of these claims. This study, though, confirms the low correlation between intelligence and face recognition/emotion perception.<br /><br />I also thought it was interesting that spatial navigation is entirely uncorrelated with intelligence according to a study he cites on page 69 of "Paradox".<br /><br />Live-Evilhttp://www.iloveiq.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-8599624640114012092015-01-18T23:47:06.132+00:002015-01-18T23:47:06.132+00:00So, in fact, "general" means nothing wha...So, in fact, "general" means nothing whatever - it might as well have been omitted.deariemenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-23768413664483183812015-01-18T17:55:43.481+00:002015-01-18T17:55:43.481+00:00Probably a difference between recognising the face...Probably a difference between recognising the face (Cambridge test) and recognising the face and putting a name or context to it.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09320614837348759094noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-12387134568723971512015-01-18T17:54:25.957+00:002015-01-18T17:54:25.957+00:00Representing all twins in England and Wales born b...Representing all twins in England and Wales born between 1994 and 1996Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09320614837348759094noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-17773263324495143862015-01-18T15:28:42.383+00:002015-01-18T15:28:42.383+00:00My wife may be, I think, better at recognising fac...My wife may be, I think, better at recognising faces than me in real life, but I am far better at recognising faces on the telly. What can it mean (a) in general, and (b) for the Cambridge test? deariemenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-62767785881247177602015-01-18T15:24:14.671+00:002015-01-18T15:24:14.671+00:00"representative of the UK's general popul..."representative of the UK's general population": does "general" mean 'white'? Or even more specifically 'old British'? Or just ... what?deariemenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-2678954271731782832015-01-17T23:40:11.506+00:002015-01-17T23:40:11.506+00:00Drop Nic a line and he can probably send you some ...Drop Nic a line and he can probably send you some additional data.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09320614837348759094noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-48902844065667618662015-01-17T23:37:17.898+00:002015-01-17T23:37:17.898+00:00Thanks for posting this, interesting stuff. I'...Thanks for posting this, interesting stuff. I'm high-IQ like the rest of your readers, but well below average in recognizing faces. I've never felt as stupid as I have taking a facial recognition test.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-89051001559440178312015-01-17T22:49:59.995+00:002015-01-17T22:49:59.995+00:00Emotional memory = face recognition??
If '&#...Emotional memory = face recognition?? <br /><br />If ''g' exist...<br /><br /><br />SantocultoAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-57864425078001402242015-01-17T22:30:43.433+00:002015-01-17T22:30:43.433+00:00Any info on the face recognition test? I wonder ho...Any info on the face recognition test? I wonder how much variance there is in this ability (i.e., are there really large individual differences in this ability in a normal sample of people)? Bryan Pestahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08489662466643928790noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4624586630299165335.post-71449544298646791432015-01-17T18:27:34.700+00:002015-01-17T18:27:34.700+00:00There's more to the story: experience moderate...There's more to the story: experience moderates the overlap between face and object recognition: http://bit.ly/1wv2WSAJennhttp://jennrichler.strikingly.comnoreply@blogger.com