We keep hearing that people are getting brighter, at least
as measured by IQ tests. This improvement, called the Flynn Effect, suggests
that each generation is brighter than the previous one. This might be due to
improved living standards as reflected in better food, better health services,
better schools and perhaps, according to some, because of the influence of the
internet and computer games. In fact, these improvements in intelligence seem
to have been going on for almost a century, and even extend to babies not in
school. If this apparent improvement in intelligence is real we should all be
much, much brighter than the Victorians.
Although IQ tests are good at picking out the brightest,
they are not so good at providing a benchmark of performance. They can show you
how you perform relative to people of your age, but because of cultural changes
relating to the sorts of problems we have to solve, they are not designed to
compare you across different decades with say, your grandparents.
Is there no way to measure changes in intelligence over time
on some absolute scale using an instrument that does not change its properties?
In the Special Issue on the Flynn Effect of the journal Intelligence Drs Michael Woodley (UK), Jan te Nijenhuis (the
Netherlands) and Raegan Murphy (Ireland) have taken a novel approach in
answering this question. It has long been known that simple reaction time is
faster in brighter people. Reaction times are a reasonable predictor of general
intelligence. These researchers have looked back at average reaction times
since 1889 and their findings, based on a meta-analysis of 14 studies, are very
sobering.
It seems that, far from speeding up, we are slowing down. We now take longer to solve this very simple reaction time “problem”. This straightforward benchmark suggests that
we are getting duller, not brighter. The loss is equivalent to about 14 IQ
points since Victorian times.
So, we are duller than the Victorians on this unchanging measure
of intelligence. Although our living standards have improved, our minds
apparently have not. What has gone wrong?
I will post more about this work, but a good start is to look at my previous post "Can I have a reaction?"
But not as clever as Newton.
ReplyDeleteCongrats Michael! :)
ReplyDeleteReaction times are correlated with IQ? Did this come from the Phys. Ed. department?
ReplyDeleteOTOH, maybe it's because being sleep-deprived and hungover lowers IQ and slows down reaction times.